<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">
<channel>
    <title>freebsd.munk.me.uk - DNS</title>
    <link>http://freebsd.munk.me.uk/</link>
    <description>FreeBSD System Administration</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.5.2 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    
    

<item>
    <title>Verisign Still Plan To Go Ahead With Site Finder</title>
    <link>http://freebsd.munk.me.uk/archives/109-Verisign-Still-Plan-To-Go-Ahead-With-Site-Finder.html</link>
            <category>DNS</category>
    
    <comments>http://freebsd.munk.me.uk/archives/109-Verisign-Still-Plan-To-Go-Ahead-With-Site-Finder.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://freebsd.munk.me.uk/wfwcomment.php?cid=109</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://freebsd.munk.me.uk/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=109</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (munk)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Less than half a year after &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.verisign.com/corporate/news/2003/pr_20031003.html&quot;&gt;Verisign was forced to remove wildcards for .com and .net domains&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1539737,00.asp&quot;&gt;rumblings of their intention to reinstate the dodgy service are being heard again&lt;/a&gt;.  Verisign was coerced by  ICANN to stop the sitefinder service - which was deemed by many to be an unfair use of Verisign&#039;s unique position as the owner of the TLD&#039;s .com and .net to generate extra advertising revenue from users arriving at the sitefinder website after mistyping .com and .net domain names.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now in a bizarre a and somewhat ironic twist of fate, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.verisign.com/corporate/news/2004/pr_20040226.html&quot;&gt;Verisign is suing ICANN&lt;/a&gt; saying &#039;ICANN overstepped its contractual authority and improperly attempted to regulate VeriSign&#039;s business in violation of its charter and its agreements with VeriSign.&#039;.  Smacks of the pot calling the kettle black eh?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EDIT: The story goes on and on... just read over on /. that a lawsuit is now being filed against BOTH ICANN and Verisign for their plans to introduce a Wait List Service (basically a back-ordering service so you can pay to have a domain name watched and as soon as it expires it&#039;s registered in your name).  Why on earth people find this proposal anti-competitive is beyond me... a number of other companies (123-reg, godaddy and they&#039;re just the two registrars I use!) already provide this service... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://freebsd.munk.me.uk/archives/109-Verisign-Still-Plan-To-Go-Ahead-With-Site-Finder.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Verisign Still Plan To Go Ahead With Site Finder&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://freebsd.munk.me.uk/archives/109-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>