<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">
<channel>
    <title>freebsd.munk.me.uk - WWW</title>
    <link>http://freebsd.munk.me.uk/</link>
    <description>FreeBSD System Administration</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.5.2 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    
    

<item>
    <title>Firefox 2.0 Released</title>
    <link>http://freebsd.munk.me.uk/archives/204-Firefox-2.0-Released.html</link>
            <category>Firefox</category>
            <category>WWW</category>
    
    <comments>http://freebsd.munk.me.uk/archives/204-Firefox-2.0-Released.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://freebsd.munk.me.uk/wfwcomment.php?cid=204</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://freebsd.munk.me.uk/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=204</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (munk)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;strong&gt;UPDATE:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Here&#039;s a list of the pros I found about 2.0 so far:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li/&gt;Memory usage actually seems to have gone down somewhat - ok ok it probably couldn&#039;t have gotten any worse!  I was half expecting memory to go through the roof with 2.0, but surprisingly it seems to actually free up memory ok when you close a lot of tabs or excess windows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;li/&gt;Generally speed wise, pages seem to load a lot faster than before.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;li/&gt;Recently closed tabs are available via the history file menu.  Can&#039;t remember that being there in 1.5.  &lt;br /&gt;
The number of days of browsing history to keep track of also seems to be configurable in Firefox 2.0 - maybe it was in 1.5, can&#039;t remember seeing it obviously though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;li/&gt;Built in anti phishing tool is pretty nifty.  Tried browsing to a phishing spam mail sent to my gmail account and Firefox spotted the site was fake, blacked the window out and popped up a warning instead with a few options on it - all in a jedi mind concentrate stylee.  Smart.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;li/&gt;Updates to extensions are now listed in a separate tab when they&#039;re found in the &#039;add ons&#039; window (Tools, Options).  Makes it easier than paging down through pages of extensions looking for the ones that have updates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;li/&gt;Interface is v snazmondo :D&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And here&#039;s a list of the cons I have so far - so far it&#039;s mainly to do with tabs:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li/&gt;Tabs in 2.0 now have individual &#039;X&#039;/close buttons on them.  I find this quite annoying - apart from taking up extra space on the tab bar, the close buttons are now harder to hit with the mouse than they used to be.  In 1.5 the X button was always to the far right of the tab bar, but now it&#039;s in a more random place on the tab bar depending on what tab you&#039;re reading/wanting to close.  In 1.5 I&#039;d just hover over to the right of the tab bar, whack on the close button and job done.  Now though in 2.0 there&#039;s a split second where I have to think &#039;mmm where&#039;s the X this time then...?&#039;.  Minor annoyance but no doubt I&#039;ll get used to it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;UPDATE:&lt;/strong&gt;As soon as I&#039;d written this, sods law, the first thing I read was an &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2006/10/the_firefox_has.html&quot;  title=&quot;Wired article, firefox 2.0 pros and cons&quot;&gt;article about pros/cons of Firefox 2.0 on Wired&lt;/a&gt; with a fix for the problem - just change &#039;browser.tabs.CloseButtons&#039; in about:config to 3 instead of the default of 1.  Still think this sucks though having to use about:config to change this kind of thing.  Also there&#039;s something in those comments about setting Firefox to not resize images automatically - the option to do that has now dissappeared in Firefox 2.0 - you have to change stuff in about:config to fix the problem.  That&#039;s another gripe I did notice but didn&#039;t think too much about last night.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;li/&gt;Come to think about it I don&#039;t like the drop down button that lists all the current tabs open either.  Again there&#039;s a fix but it involves editing the userChrome.css file found in the Firefox profile folder.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-tweaks-tab-browsing/&quot;  title=&quot;Tab tweaks for Firefox 2.0&quot;&gt;Here is a list of other tab tweaks for Firefox 2.0.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;li/&gt;There&#039;s a new feature to allow Firefox to restart itself after extensions etc have installed themselves.  Unfortunately though this useful feature doesn&#039;t seem to have a user interface - it&#039;s only available to extension installations (and themes?).  It&#039;d be good to be able to restart the browser when you make changes in the &#039;Addons&#039; window - for example when you disable/enable some extension or another and want to restart the browser but keep your session going.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;li/&gt;Too much faffing around in about:config!!! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;li/&gt;Ok, yet another problem that needs config changing to fix it.  I&#039;m not mad about the &#039;restore from crash&#039; functionality - if firefox crashes it automatically restores the last &#039;session&#039; - group of windows/tabs.  Unfortunately I often close my machine down using the power button on the PC and any open windows are &#039;gracelessly&#039; killed - so next time I boot up, Firefox cheerfully asks me if I want to restore the crashed session which isn&#039;t really what I want and is quite annoying tbh.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resolution is - surprise surprise yet another hack - to edit the config so the value of the boolean config option &lt;a href=&quot;http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser.sessionstore.resume_from_crash&quot;  title=&quot;http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser.sessionstore.resume_from_crash&quot;&gt;browser.sessionstore.resume_from_crash&lt;/a&gt; is set to false.  In my case the key didn&#039;t even exist so I had to create it first and set it to &#039;false&#039;.  Haven&#039;t actually tested it out yet but presumably it works and doesn&#039;t give the annoying nag about resuming the session after a &#039;crash&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Have to say all these config changes I&#039;ve had to make so far are pretty tedious and if it weren&#039;t for this article I&#039;d probably forget how I did it all if I needed to reinstall.  By the same token though the very fact you can hack away at the config at all via about:config so easily is quite nice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;hr/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/2.0/releasenotes/&quot;  title=&quot;Firefox 2.0 Release Notes&quot;&gt;Mozilla have just released a new point version of Firefox, version 2.0&lt;/a&gt;.  I held off installing and testing the beta/release candidate versions for a while because so many of the extensions I use wouldn&#039;t work with 2.0, but now 2.0 is officially out it seems most of my extensions now work ok.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There were 6 extensions that weren&#039;t compatible with 2.0 - most of them I could live without, but there was one, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pikey.me.uk/mozilla/?extension=cw&quot;  title=&quot;Clone Window Firefox Extension&quot;&gt;Clone Window&lt;/a&gt;, that I really couldn&#039;t do without.  Clone window allows you to create a new tab/window with the history of the tab/window it was cloned from, without this the world just isn&#039;t right, bit like going out on the tiles for a few beers and waking up the next morning wondering how the fsck you ended up in a tent. :D&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I ended up finding a similar extension called &lt;a href=&quot;http://twanno.mozdev.org/duplicatetab/index.html&quot;  title=&quot;Duplicate Tab Firefox Extension&quot;&gt;Duplicate Tabs&lt;/a&gt; which effectively does the same thing as Clone Window and more even.  As well as creating clone tabs/windows, it even allows you to merge all open windows or a selection of open tabs into one window which is quite cool (not sure how much I&#039;ll use it but it&#039;s a good idea none the less).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only trouble with the Duplicate Tabs extension is that the default key mapping to clone a tab - ctrl-shift-t - wouldn&#039;t work.  Turns out that mapping was already in use by the &lt;a href=&quot;http://chrispederick.com/work/webdeveloper/&quot;  title=&quot;Web Developer Firefox Extension&quot;&gt;Web Developer extension&lt;/a&gt; - tried changing the mapping in the web developer options, but that didn&#039;t seem to make any difference which was annoying.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually tried to change the mapping using &lt;em&gt;yet another&lt;/em&gt; extension called &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=72994&quot;  title=&quot;Keyconfig Extension&quot;&gt;keyconfig&lt;/a&gt; - although annoyingly keyconfig wouldn&#039;t install because it wasn&#039;t compatible with 2.0! Grr... so I&#039;ve now kind of hacked things up so it WOULD install by adding a boolean key &lt;a href=&quot;http://kb.mozillazine.org/Extensions.checkCompatibility&quot;  title=&quot;http://kb.mozillazine.org/Extensions.checkCompatibility&quot;&gt;extensions.checkCompatibility&lt;/a&gt; in about:config in Firefox and setting it to false - this stops Firefox checking the compatibility of extensions when they&#039;re installed or started with Firefox.  Not entirely sure this is a good thing yet since it&#039;s now enabled all the extensions (those 6 above) that weren&#039;t compatible with 2.0 and there&#039;s a chance that might cause problems.  Will see.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally though moving to Firefox 2.0 actually seems like a positive experience - browsing does seem to be faster in some unquantifiable way.  Whether this is just the smoother looking interface making things seem quicker... I don&#039;t think it is... pages actually do seem to load faster now so I&#039;m a happy bunny right now.  Once all my extensions are compatible without forcing them I&#039;ll be even happier :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you&#039;ve not upgraded as yet, I&#039;d recommend it now it&#039;s offical.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;ll add any extra comments about my experience as I go on.&lt;br /&gt;
 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 01:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://freebsd.munk.me.uk/archives/204-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
</item>
<item>
    <title>Attempts To Exploit My_ eGallery Vulnerability Target Random Sites</title>
    <link>http://freebsd.munk.me.uk/archives/153-Attempts-To-Exploit-My_-eGallery-Vulnerability-Target-Random-Sites.html</link>
            <category>Apache</category>
            <category>PHP</category>
            <category>Security</category>
            <category>WWW</category>
    
    <comments>http://freebsd.munk.me.uk/archives/153-Attempts-To-Exploit-My_-eGallery-Vulnerability-Target-Random-Sites.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://freebsd.munk.me.uk/wfwcomment.php?cid=153</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://freebsd.munk.me.uk/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=153</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (munk)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    This is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/9113/info/&quot;&gt;by no means a new attempt &lt;/a&gt;to exploit a vulnerability in a PHP web application, but since I started using snort as a full time intrusion detection system I&#039;ve picked up countless attempts to exploit a vulnerability in an online PHP photo gallery called &lt;a href=&quot;http://lottasophie.sourceforge.net/&quot;&gt;My_ eGallery&lt;/a&gt;.  The annoying thing about this is that I&#039;ve never had this gallery system installed on any of the sites I maintain - particularly the one that keeps getting hit - but they continue to try their exploits.  Read on for more... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://freebsd.munk.me.uk/archives/153-Attempts-To-Exploit-My_-eGallery-Vulnerability-Target-Random-Sites.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Attempts To Exploit My_ eGallery Vulnerability Target Random Sites&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2004 06:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://freebsd.munk.me.uk/archives/153-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>